Printable version

Sustainability is not just a buzzword; it’s a pressing issue that demands our attention. Brands and retailers have put much effort into more responsible practices, but can they keep up with the increasingly stringent regulations? Are customers truly aligning their actions with their sustainability beliefs? IADS delves into the world of sustainability in fashion, exploring its meaning, how fashion brands and department stores can incorporate sustainable practices, and addressing the above questions.

Sustainability…. Everyone is talking about sustainability, but what does it really mean?

Sustainability refers to the practice of meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It incorporates three main pillars: environmental protection, social equity, and economic viability. Applied to fashion, sustainability involves the entire lifecycle of a product, from design and raw material sourcing to production, distribution, use, and finally, disposal.

The fashion industry's environmental impact is not just a local issue but a global crisis. It's one of the largest contributors to pollution worldwide, with significant water consumption and pollution, carbon emissions, waste generation, and resource depletion. For instance, a fashion industry staple, cotton production, is notoriously water-intensive. Moreover, the dyeing and treatment processes for textiles often release harmful chemicals into water bodies, further increasing the problem. The fashion industry is responsible for approximately 10% of global carbon emissions due to the excessive use of fossil fuels in textile production and transportation. Furthermore, fast fashion has led to a culture of “disposability”, with consumers frequently discarding garments after only a few uses, resulting in vast amounts of textile waste, much of which ends up in landfills. Lastly, synthetic fibres, such as polyester, rely on non-recyclable resources like petroleum, and deforestation for materials like rayon contributes to biodiversity loss.

Sustainability in fashion extends beyond environmental considerations to include significant social and economic dimensions. The industry's impact on labour forces is particularly concerning, as many fashion brands outsource production to countries with weak labour laws, leading to exploitation, poor working conditions, and inadequate wages. Child labour remains a critical issue in some regions, with children working in hazardous conditions to produce garments and accessories. Workers often face unsafe environments, exposure to harmful chemicals, and inadequate safety measures, compromising their health and safety. Economic sustainability in fashion is not just about profits; it's about ensuring businesses can thrive financially while adopting responsible practices. This means paying fair wages, maintaining ethical supply chains, and adopting innovative business models like circular fashion, where products are designed for reuse, recycling, or composting. Educating consumers to make informed choices and fostering a market for sustainable products are also essential components of economic sustainability.

Case Studies: brands that have emerged as sustainable leaders

As environmental and social issues become increasingly pressing, fashion brands must adopt sustainable practices to remain up-to-date and responsible. This involves a diverse approach that addresses ecological impacts, social equity, and economic viability. By doing so, fashion brands can reduce their negative effects, drive innovation, capture new market opportunities, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

To achieve sustainability, fashion brands can implement various practices throughout their operations. These include incorporating eco-friendly materials, designing for durability, and creating timeless styles to reduce environmental impact. Using organic cotton, recycled polyester, and other sustainable materials minimises the ecological footprint of raw material sourcing and production. Ensuring fair labour practices, safe working conditions, and fair wages throughout the supply chain supports social sustainability. Transparency is also crucial; implementing traceability systems to monitor and report on the sustainability of supply chain practices builds consumer trust and ensures accountability. Minimising waste is another important strategy, and brands can do so by eliminating waste design techniques, recycling fabric scraps, and promoting garment repair and reuse. Energy efficiency is also essential for environmental sustainability, which involves utilising renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency in production processes, and reducing carbon emissions. Responsible water use practices and the implementation of water-saving technologies in textile production can significantly reduce the industry's water footprint. Engaging consumers in sustainability efforts is vital; educating them about sustainable fashion, encouraging them to buy higher quality items less frequently, repairing and recycling garments, and making mindful purchasing decisions can drive broader changes in the market.

The transition to sustainability presents numerous challenges for fashion brands. Sustainable materials and ethical production processes can be more expensive, posing financial challenges for smaller brands. Shifting consumer preferences toward sustainable fashion requires significant marketing and educational efforts. Moreover, ensuring sustainability across complex global supply chains can be discouraging as it requires rigorous monitoring and collaboration.

Despite these challenges, substantial opportunities exist that brands can successfully adopt to differentiate themselves in a crowded market, attracting environmentally and socially conscious consumers. The quest for sustainability also drives innovation, developing new materials, technologies, and business models. Ultimately, sustainable practices contribute to the long-term life of fashion brands by alleviating risks associated with resource scarcity, regulatory changes, and shifting consumer preferences. By embracing sustainability, the fashion industry can reduce its environmental footprint and create a more fair and prosperous future for all interested parties.

Below are five case studies of sustainable brands:

Stella McCartney: a pioneer in sustainable luxury fashion, Stella McCartney’s brand avoids using leather and fur, uses eco-friendly materials, and promotes ethical production practices. Her Fall-Winter 2022 collection was 87% responsible, whilst her Spring-Summer 2023 collection reached 91% responsibly sourced materials.

Eileen Fisher: this brand focuses on timeless, sustainable fashion, using organic fibres, promoting garment recycling, and supporting fair labour practices. In 2022, 81% of their raw materials met third-party sustainable criteria, 73% of materials were processed using safer chemistry, they tracked 92% of their apparel manufacturers’ energy sources, and the brand supported eight policy initiatives in support of climate action, reproductive health, responsible business, and voting rights.

Reformation: emphasise transparency, provide detailed information about each product's environmental impact, and use sustainable materials and production processes. In the next few years, they want a 100% circularity commitment that removes new materials, makes all of their products recyclable, and helps them become climate-positive. They aim to do this in four different steps: making smarter materials, using better practices, making for good circularity, and transparency.

Patagonia: known for its commitment to environmental activism, Patagonia uses organised and recycled materials, supports fair trade practices, and encourages consumers to repair and recycle products. Its dedication to the climate is implicated in every part of its business. They want to reduce their carbon emissions by transforming how they make their products, use their resources to protect nature and support communities as they stop using fossil fuels, and demand systemic change from the industry and the government.

Ganni: rather than claiming a false vision of sustainability, Ganni focuses on innovation, transparency, and creating visibility for stakeholders and consumers through various honest and small initiatives that show a realistic path on the journey to becoming responsible.  These initiatives involve such things as using recycled materials for store props (such as rugs made of fabric waste), having a team dedicated to counting fabric innovations, recycling coffee waste to grow mushrooms, and consistency.

The role of department stores

Department stores in Europe face a unique challenge in the current sustainable fashion landscape with the new regulatory demands. They must ensure that their brands comply with new EU sustainability regulations, which require them to act as intermediaries, ensuring their suppliers meet the necessary standards. Using their significant purchasing power, they can influence and support brands in their supply chain to adopt sustainable practices, providing financial incentives, extending lead times, or offering logistical support for conformity.

In the US, retailers and brands are preparing to integrate the New York Fashion Act, also known as the Fashion Sustainability and Social Accountability Act, which was first introduced in 2022, and later reintroduced in 2023.

Department stores are directly accountable for meeting sustainability regulations for their private labels. This involves managing their own supply chains and ensuring agreement with the new standards, which will then mean investment in infrastructure, such as new machinery and systems for managing product data. Conformity comes with significant costs, including hiring data management staff and investing in energy-efficient technologies. Department stores need to balance these costs while remaining competitive in the market, and pricing strategies may need to be adjusted to reflect the increased costs of sustainable practices. Importantly, communicating the value of these practices to consumers can help justify higher prices.

Department stores can play a pivotal role in promoting partnerships with brands and suppliers, sharing the financial burden of compliance and developing innovative solutions for sustainability. Providing training and resources to suppliers can help them meet compliance requirements more effectively, acting as facilitators of knowledge and best practices.

There is an opportunity to educate consumers about the importance of sustainable fashion and the efforts being made to comply with new regulations, which can help build brand loyalty and justify higher prices. Offering transparency about the supply chain and the sustainability practices of private labels and other brands can enhance consumer trust and support.

Galeries Lafayette created a label called “Go for Good” as an example of this.  The “Go for Good” label is an initiative launched to promote responsible and sustainable fashion. It identifies products that meet social and environmental responsibility criteria, including eco-friendly materials, ethical production processes, and positive social impact. The goal is to make it easier for consumers to make informed, sustainable choices and support brands prioritising sustainability and ethical practices.

Incorporating sustainability into department stores' core values and business models can provide a competitive edge. This involves long-term planning and a commitment to sustainable practices. Department stores can also lead the way in finding innovative solutions to meet regulatory requirements, such as developing new sustainable materials or investing in renewable energy projects.

Green Pea, located in Turin, Italy, is a pioneering retail department store that opened in December 2020, dedicated to promoting sustainability and eco-friendly living, and is the world's first Green Retail Park focused on sustainable lifestyles. The building itself exemplifies sustainable architecture with features such as green roofs, solar panels, and geothermal energy systems, emphasising natural light and renewable materials.

It offers a diverse range of eco-friendly products, including clothing, home goods, food, and furniture. These items are sourced from brands committed to sustainability, ensuring they are made from renewable, recycled, or organic materials. Beyond shopping, Green Pea provides an environment with spaces for workshops, events, and exhibitions focused on green living and environmental awareness. The retail park also features restaurants prioritising organic and locally sourced ingredients and services like eco-friendly dry cleaning and electric vehicle charging stations. It aims to create a community centred around sustainability, offering educational programs and initiatives designed to inspire employees and visitors to adopt more sustainable lifestyles.

Critical concepts in understanding the environment’s impact on the retail industry are Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.

• Scope 1 emissions refer to direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by a company, such as emissions from company vehicles or on-site fuel combustion. In the retail sector, this includes emissions from delivery trucks, store heating systems, and any other equipment directly under the company’s control. Reducing Scope 1 emissions involves improving energy efficiency, adopting cleaner technologies, and transitioning to renewable energy sources.
• Scope 2 emissions encompass indirect emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heating, and cooling consumed by the reporting company. For retailers, this typically involves the energy used to power stores, warehouses, and distribution centres. These emissions are not directly produced by the retail company but are a consequence of its energy consumption. Strategies to reduce Scope 2 emissions include investing in energy-efficient lighting and HVAC systems, purchasing green energy, and installing on-site renewable energy systems such as solar panels.
• Scope 3 emissions are the most extensive and challenging to manage, covering all other indirect emissions that occur in a company’s value chain. For the retail industry, this includes emissions from product manufacturing, transportation, use of sold products, and disposal. These emissions account for a significant portion of a retailer's carbon footprint, encompassing the entire product lifecycle. Reducing Scope 3 emissions requires collaboration with suppliers, improving supply chain efficiency, promoting sustainable products, and encouraging customers to adopt eco-friendly practices. Addressing this emission is vital for the retail industry to achieve comprehensive sustainability goals and reduce its overall environmental impact.

In summary, department stores must navigate the dual role of coordinating with the brands they carry and ensuring their private labels comply with new sustainability regulations. This requires strategic collaboration, significant investment in infrastructure, and a commitment to educating and engaging with consumers. By using their influence and resources, department stores can be crucial in driving the fashion industry towards a more sustainable future.

The behaviour where customers desire sustainability but continue to spend money on non-sustainable clothing is referred to as the “attitude-behaviour gap” or the “value-action gap”. This behaviour can be attributed to several factors, with cost and accessibility being number one on the list. Business of Fashion dedicated an article to “What’s behind the Slow Fashion Recession?” diving into the slow fashion movement and how it promotes ethical consumption and sustainability but how consumers struggle with the willingness to pay higher prices.

Sustainable clothing is often more expensive and less accessible than fast fashion alternatives. Many consumers may prioritise affordability and convenience over sustainability when making purchasing decisions. Awareness and understanding can also be seen as a factor. At the same time, consumers may be aware of sustainability as a concept, and they might not fully understand what makes a product sustainable or recognise the impact of their purchasing choices. Misleading marketing can also contribute to this confusion. Shopping habits and the convenience of fast fashion play a significant role here too.  Consumers are used to the quick turnover of styles, and the ease of purchasing from fast fashion brands makes it difficult to change consumer behaviour. Peer pressure and societal norms can influence purchasing behaviour. If sustainable fashion is not the norm in their social circles, consumers might find it challenging to change their shopping habits. In some markets, sustainable fashion options may be limited, making it difficult for consumers to find and purchase sustainable clothing.

Addressing this gap requires efforts from all parties involved. Brands must provide clear and honest information about their products and sustainability efforts. Educating consumers about the true cost of fashion and the benefits of sustainable choices can help bridge the gap, or by making sustainable fashion more affordable and accessible can encourage consumers to make more sustainable choices. This can possibly be achieved through economies of scale, innovations in sustainable materials, and supportive policies. Retailers and policymakers can implement strategies that push consumers towards more sustainable choices, such as rewarding sustainable purchases or making sustainable options more prominent. Lastly, encouraging a cultural shift towards valuing sustainability and responsible consumption can influence consumer behaviour over time.

While the attitude-behaviour gap is a significant challenge, addressing it through education, transparency, and systematic changes can help align consumer behaviour with their stated values.

*Leading brands such as Stella McCartney, Eileen Fisher, Reformation, Patagonia, and Ganni are setting examples by using eco-friendly materials, promoting transparency, and supporting fair labour practices. Department stores face the challenge of complying with local sustainability regulations and must manage their supply chains and educate consumers. Initiatives like Galeries Lafayette's "Go for Good" label and Green Pea's sustainable retail park in Turin demonstrate how stores can champion sustainable practices.

Understanding and reducing Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions is essential for the retail sector. These emissions include direct emissions from company-owned sources, indirect emissions from purchased energy, and other indirect emissions throughout the value chain. Consumers often express a desire for sustainability but are reluctant to pay higher prices, a phenomenon known as the "attitude-behaviour gap." Factors influencing this gap include cost, accessibility, awareness, convenience, and social norms. Addressing this gap requires education, transparency, and systemic changes to align consumer behaviour with sustainable values.

Setting ambitious goals, particularly in areas like sustainability, is a complex effort that demands careful planning, commitment, and long-term vision. The difficulty lies in defining these targets and maintaining the determination to them through, even as circumstances change. Achieving such goals requires sustained effort, resources, and often the ability to adapt strategies without compromising the originally intent. Over time, as market conditions, political climates, and internal priorities shift, the temptation to revise or abandon these objectives can grow stronger. Yet, the true challenges to stay committed in pursuing these goals, ensuring that the initial ambition is not diluted or sidelined but is met with the persistence and innovation necessary to overcome obstacles and realise meaningful progress*

Credits: IADS (Elisabetta Falco Beccalli)