How are C-suites reacting to Trump’s DEI orders?

News
 |  
Mar 2025
 |  
ESG Dive
Save to favorites
Your item is now saved. It can take a few minutes to sync into your saved list.

What: Corporate leaders across retail and financial sectors are systematically modifying DEI initiatives, with major asset managers abandoning specific diversity requirements while companies maintain core inclusion practices.

Why it is important: The parallel changes in retail and financial sectors demonstrate how corporate governance is evolving to balance stakeholder expectations with risk management, potentially reshaping industry standards for years to come.

A significant transformation is underway in corporate America's approach to diversity initiatives, with both retailers and financial institutions making strategic adjustments to their DEI policies. The Littler survey reveals that while only 8% of C-suite leaders are considering major DEI program changes, more than half express concerns about related legal risks and enforcement. This cautious approach is reflected in specific changes, with 52% of those making modifications focusing on eliminating DEI benchmarks to avoid quota perceptions. The response varies across sectors, with some companies maintaining core inclusion practices while removing explicit DEI language, and others facing shareholder pressure and legal challenges. State Street's recent decision to abandon its board diversity requirements, following similar moves by BlackRock and Vanguard, signals a broader shift away from prescriptive metrics. Despite these changes, 47% of executives maintain that DEI commitments will either remain stable or grow, suggesting a strategic evolution rather than wholesale abandonment of inclusion efforts.

IADS Notes: The retail industry's response to DEI initiatives has undergone a dramatic transformation since late 2024. In November 2024, Walmart pioneered a strategic pivot by maintaining inclusion practices while removing explicit DEI language, achieving strong market performance. By March 2025, this approach gained further validation as major asset managers, including State Street, abandoned prescriptive diversity requirements. The emergence of the FAIR framework earlier in January offered companies a new way to balance inclusive practices with business performance, particularly relevant as Target faced a USD 10 billion valuation loss and shareholder lawsuit. These developments demonstrate how companies are adapting their social initiatives while navigating complex political and market pressures.; provide the keywords in list format followed by commas


How are C-suites reacting to Trump’s DEI orders?


State Street ditches board diversity requirement, completes Big Three DEI retreat